JILI86 JILI vs PG Soft: What Each Studio Publishes

JILI vs PG Soft is really a question about what each studio is willing to publish, before it’s a question about which games play better. JILI states no RTP for any of its fourteen titles; PG Soft states one for every title it carries, even though the figure never shows on PG Soft’s own game page.

JILI vs PG Soft: what each studio actually publishes

	JILI	PG Soft
RTP published	No, on any of 14 titles	Yes, on every title, via published game data
Where RTP appears	Nowhere on jiligames.com	In the data feed, not the visible page
Licence position	PAGCOR EGLD content approval only	Malta Gaming Authority, licence MGA/B2B/435/2017
Highest published max win here	10,000x (Super Ace, Money Coming)	100,000x (Mahjong Ways 2, Lucky Neko)

Neither RTP absence nor a Malta licence tells you which studio’s games suit you better — they tell you which numbers you can actually check before playing.

PG Soft vs JILI on RTP: one publishes, one doesn’t

PG Soft’s published game data lists a specific figure for every title: 96.92% on Mahjong Ways, 96.95% on Mahjong Ways 2, 96.81% on Fortune Tiger, 96.73% on Lucky Neko and on Wild Bandito. JILI’s own game pages carry no RTP field on any of fourteen titles checked, Super Ace and Fortune Gems included.

That gap is the studio’s own choice, not a difference this site can fill in. Where PG Soft’s page shows a blank dash, the published figure still exists in the data the studio sends the server; where JILI shows nothing, no figure exists to find.

Grid and max win: Super Ace against Mahjong Ways 2

Both titles run 1,024 ways on a 5x4 grid, which makes the maximum-win gap between them the clearer comparison than RTP:

1. Super Ace (JILI): 1,024 ways, 5x4 grid, 10,000x published maximum, golden-card wilds that flip mid-play.
2. Mahjong Ways 2 (PG Soft): 2,000 ways, 5x4 grid, 100,000x published maximum, avalanche cascades with a rising free-spins multiplier.

Ten times the ways-count difference does not explain a tenfold gap in maximum win on its own — the free-spins multiplier mechanic each studio built is doing the rest of that work.

Volatility: how each catalogue actually plays

Volatility label	JILI titles here	PG Soft titles here
Low to medium	Super Ace, Fortune Gems, Golden Empire, Wild Ace, Money Coming	—
Medium	Super Ace Deluxe, Mega Ace, Fortune Gems 2, Charge Buffalo	Mahjong Ways, Mahjong Ways 2, Fortune Tiger, Fortune Ox, Lucky Neko, Treasures of Aztec
Medium to high	Fortune Gems 3	—
High	—	Wild Bandito, Wild Bounty Showdown

JILI’s fourteen titles lean toward the low-to-medium end; PG Soft’s eight span medium through to two high-volatility entries. Neither pattern is better on its own — it decides how long a given bankroll survives a dry stretch.

Jili or PG Soft: which suits the way you play

1. Want every figure checkable before you play, RTP included? PG Soft’s published game data gives you one; JILI does not.
2. Want the highest published ceiling on a single spin? PG Soft’s 100,000x titles outrank anything in JILI’s fourteen.
3. Want a catalogue that leans gentler on volatility by default? JILI’s low-to-medium spread fits a smaller bankroll more often than PG Soft’s higher-volatility entries do.
4. Building a shortlist either way, run it against what to check during slot selection rather than picking by studio name alone.

Where to verify either studio’s figures yourself

1. For JILI titles, open JILI’s own studio profile and cross-check against jiligames.com directly — no RTP will appear, and that absence is itself the fact to record.
2. For PG Soft titles, open PG Soft’s own studio profile and note that its published game data carries the figure even when the visible page does not.
3. Run any shortlist from either studio against the JILI slot tips that hold up to the maths before sizing a session around it.